It’s official: the lifespan of SSL/TLS certificates will be reduced to 47 days

It's official: the lifespan of SSL/TLS certificates will be reduced to 47 days

On 9 October 2024, Apple announced at the CA/B Forum (Certification Authority Browser Forum) its intention to reduce the maximum duration of public SSL/TLS certificates to 45 days by 2027, as well as to reduce the DCV challenge reuse period to 10 days by 2027.

This request was then discussed and amended six months later, again by Apple, which proposed a change to the initial schedule with a reduced certificate duration of 47 days for SSL/TLS certificates and a DCV challenge validation period of 10 days from 15 March 2028.

This measure officially comes into force following the CA/B Forum vote in April 2025, which adopted a new implementation schedule, officially reducing the validity of certificates to 47 days and thus promoting automation for the proper management of these certificates.

  • Until 15 March 2026, the maximum TLS certificate lifetime will remain at 398 days.
  • From 15 March 2026, the maximum TLS certificate lifetime will be 200 days.
  • From 15 March 2027, it will be reduced to 100 days.
  • And from 15 March 2029, the maximum TLS certificate lifetime will be reduced to 47 days.

At the same time, the reuse periods for Domain Control Validation (DCV challenge), which involve intervening in the domain name zone listed in the certificate to validate it, will be aligned with the certificate schedule, reaching 10 days in 2029.

  • Until 15 March 2026, the maximum period during which domain validation information can be reused is 398 days.
  • From 15 March 2026 onwards, the maximum period during which domain validation information can be reused is 200 days.
  • From 15 March 2027 onwards, the maximum period during which domain validation information can be reused is 100 days.
  • From 15 March 2029 onwards, the maximum period during which domain validation information can be reused is 10 days.

Faced with these major changes coming in 2026, it is essential for businesses to prepare

The CA/B Forum’s initiative will gradually transform the digital certificate security landscape. The validity period of SSL/TLS certificates will be reduced, accompanied by stricter DCV challenge validation rules. The key to effective certificate management in the future will therefore lie in automation. With certificates valid for 47 days in 2029, that means nine interventions per year per certificate, making manual management unfeasible. It will therefore be necessary to rely on the following services/software:

  • Certificate provider/Certification Authority (CA): a trusted partner who will assist you with organization and domain authentication issues. The level of service is key to effective management. A multi-CA partner is recommended to limit dependence on a single CA, as demonstrated by the recent difficulties experienced by Entrust.
  • Registrar/Primary DNS: controlling the primary DNS of the domain names listed in the certificates will become key to delivery. Each certificate issue will result in the installation of a TXT or CNAME on the zone(s) concerned. Having an interconnection between the CA and the DNS is essential.
  • CLM editor: the CLM is responsible for inventorying the certificate pool, defining pool management rules, and ensuring complete automation of the ordering process, from CSR generation to certificate deployment on servers. To function, it relies on connectors with CAs or certificate providers.

Preparing therefore means identifying the solutions that suit you best in these three areas and starting to think about the impact on processes, technology and budget, so that you are ideally prepared for the first half of 2026.

Nameshield, an ally to help you manage these changes

Nameshield occupies a unique position in the market as both a registrar and a provider of multi-CA certificates. For over 10 years and on a daily basis, we have been managing all issues related to organization and domain authentication linked to certificates, thanks to our privileged relationship with the largest CAs on the market (Digicert, Sectigo, GlobalSign) and our expertise in DNS for DCV challenge validation. As a result, we issue public certificates almost instantly. Finally, regarding the CLM component, Nameshield has connectors with the largest players on the market to enable you to ensure a complete connection between the various components related to certificate management. We therefore support you in anticipating all the issues mentioned above.

If you have any further questions, you can contact Nameshield directly here.

SSL/TLS certificate duration reduced to 45 days by 2027:Apple takes the first step

On October 9, Apple revealed to the CA/Browser Forum that it had posted a draft ballot for comment on GitHub regarding two important SSL/TLS certificate lifetime events:

  • Gradually reduce the maximum duration of public SSL/TLS certificates to 45 days by 2027;
     
  • Gradually reduce the reuse period for DCV challenges to 10 days by 2027.

In March 2023, in its “Moving Forward, Together” roadmap, Google announced its intention to offer the CA/B Forum a reduction on the maximum possible validity period for public TLS certificates going  from 398 days to 90 days. Since this announcement, the market has been feverishly awaiting for Google’s confirmation but most of all, for the implementation’s timetable… without success. For its part, Mozilla announced, a few weeks ago, its intention to follow Google’s lead on its Firefox browser, without adding any further detail.

Apple ultimately took the first step last week, announcing on October 9th its intention to both reduce the lifetime of certificates to 45 days (when the entire market was expecting 90 days) and to limit the duration of the DCV challenge to 10 days, according to the schedule below. A true bombshell:

Sep-15-2025 => certificates and DCV validation times reduced to 200 days

Sep-15-2026 => certificates and DCV validation times reduced to 100 days

Apr-15-2027 => certificates and DCV validation times reduced to 45 days

Sep-15-2027 => DCV Validation time: 10 days

Information on the background and analysis of this announcement, the expected outcomes and how to prepare for them will undoubtedly be useful:

Context and Analysis:

At this stage, the publication is likely to be commented by market players prior to the formal drafting of the ballot within the CA/B Forum, which itself will be voted on by its members: the Internet browser publishers on the one hand (Google, Mozilla, Apple and Microsoft…) and the Certification Authorities on the other. Amendments are bound to be made, but the general idea remains and the machine is up and running.

Indeed, software publishers are all aligned on the need to reduce the lifetime of certificates, and among Certification Authorities, Sectigo, one of the major players in the certificate industry, is already supporting the initiative. It is likely that things will move rapidly from now on, with few comments and a ballot drafted in the coming weeks or months. We will then know more about the confirmation of the durations and timetable, and will of course make sure to keep you informed.

Expected Outcomes:

  • Certificate lifetime: whether 90 days, 45 days or even less, this reduction is no longer a surprise, and will have a major impact on public certificate portfolio. The certificates can no longer be managed manually. The market has begun its transition to automation, notably through CLMs (Certificate Lifecycle Managers). The issue at stake for companies and organizations will be to rely on partners who can offer as many interconnections as possible between Organizations, Certification Authorities and CLMs.
     
  • DCV challenge duration: Reducing the duration of the DCV challenge to 10 days, if validated, would have a considerable impact, perhaps even more so than reducing the lifetime of certificates. Up until now, the industry has pre-validated domain names for 398 days, using the DCV challenge only once. Apple’s announcement would thus force the use of a DCV challenge for virtually all orders, which would be a major paradigm shift and would involve interconnections with an additional brick in the ecosystem: the DNS. The DCV (Domain Control Validation) challenge involves intervening in the zone of the domain name(s) listed in the certificate, ideally instantaneously, to validate it.
     
  • Organization authentication duration: Apple has not announced anything on the subject of the validity period of organization authentication for OV certificates, which is currently 825 days. However, rumors are circulating that this may be reduced to 398 days or even 365 days.

How to be ready:

The key to successful certificates management lies in automation. A 45 days certificate lifetime represents 9 interventions per year per certificate. Manual management thus becomes utopian. We therefore need to rely on:

  1. Certificate Provider/Certification Authority (CA): a trusted partner who will support through your organizational and domain authentication issues. Service level is key to good management. A multi-CA partner is thus recommended to limit dependence on a single CA, as in the case of Entrust’s recent setbacks. 
     
  2. Registrar / Primary DNS: mastering the primary DNS of domain names listed in certificates will become the key to delivery. Each time a certificate is issued, a TXT or CNAME will be installed on the zone(s) in question. An interconnection between the CA and the DNS is vital.
     
  3. CLM editor: the CLM’s role is to inventory the certificate portfolio, to define certificate portfolio management rules and automate the entire process of orders, from the generation of CSRs to the deployment of certificates on servers. To function properly, the CLM relies on connectors with CAs or certificate suppliers.

Getting ready thus means identifying the most suitable solution, based on these three dimensions, and undertaking this analysis to understand the impacts in terms of process, technology, and budget – in an ideal world – before the end of the first half of 2025.

Nameshield’s approach:

Nameshield holds a unique position in the market as a registrar and supplier of multi-AC certificates. For over 10 years, we have been managing the day-to-day issues associated with authenticating organizations and domains using certificates. On the one hand, we have a privileged relationship with the biggest CAs on the market (Digicert, Sectigo, GlobalSign), and on the other, we master the DNS brick for DCV validation. As a result, we can issue public certificates almost instantaneously. Last but not least, Nameshield has connectors with the major players in the CLM market, allowing you to ensure a comprehensive connection between the various components involved in certificate management. This way, we can support you in anticipating all the issues mentioned above.

SSL/TLS certificate duration reduced to 45 days by 2027:Apple takes the first step

For more information, please contact our Sales team or our Certificates team.

User trust at the heart of the latest CSA Summit in Cologne

From 22 to 24 April, Cologne hosted the Certified Senders Alliance Summit on the theme of “Trust fuels the future”. The event marked the 20th anniversary of the initiative.

Corporate communications have changed dramatically over the last 20 years with the rise of social networks. For example, Instagram now has more than 2 billion monthly users, YouTube more than 2.5 billion and Facebook more than 3 billion. These platforms were all launched between 2004 and 2010. While they have become an integral part of companies’ communications plans for addressing their users, the use of email is still very high, as there are still so many uses for email: sending email campaigns, newsletters, invoices or for example order confirmations. According to Statista, the overall volume of emails increased by 4.3% in 2023 compared with the previous year, with almost 347.3 billion emails sent worldwide every day. Another fact: on average, a person receives around 121 emails a day. These figures underline that email is not about to disappear.

Gartner nevertheless points out that concerns about email security are growing, with few companies escaping security incidents, with increasingly sophisticated phishing attacks using malicious links or attachments, for example, and data losses often linked to careless behaviour or human error. With this in mind, every year CSA brings together experts from the email ecosystem to discuss best practices and solutions for improving email quality and trust. The event is organised around a series of workshops, sessions, conferences and masterclasses.

Nameshield, which sponsored the event, pointed out that there can be no email security without secure domain names, which are critical business assets, and without a robust, high-performance DNS infrastructure. Email security therefore depends on the choice of your domain name provider and the cyber-security solutions it is able to offer its customers. These include the DMARC protocol, which protects users against fraudulent messages. Customised brand extensions also known as dot brands are another way of building brand confidence in the run-up to the next round of new generic extensions scheduled for April 2026.

Contact your Nameshield consultant for more information on all our solutions.

Nameshield at the CSA Summit in Cologne – From April 22 to 24, 2024

Celebrate the 20th anniversary with us and be part of the discussion about the future of commercial emails.

For 20 years, the CSA (Certified Senders Alliance) has been committed to strengthening trust in email as a communication channel. Building bridges between email senders and email providers has been the central goal of the CSA from the very beginning – this year’s anniversary summit will examine the success factors of the future under the motto ‘Trust Fuels the Future’.

Nameshield is a Gold Sponsor of the event – our team would be delighted to meet you there. Gain market-leading expertise with CSA’s insights and evolving best practices. We are particularly looking forward to the discussion around the implementation of DMARC, which is becoming a new standard.

Join an international network of brands, agencies, email service providers and mailbox vendors for a dynamic exchange of information in the well-connected email ecosystem! The CSA Email Summit is not just an event, it’s your path to realising your full potential in the ever-evolving landscape of commercial email.

The CSA Email Summit is supported by various industry associations and provides a solid platform for conversations that offer valuable insights into the future of email marketing. Learn from industry experts in workshops, sessions, short talks and masterclasses to enhance your expertise.

Please contact the Nameshield team for more information and to make an appointment at the Summit!

DNSSEC: Nameshield adopts ECDSA

DNSSEC is the protocol that guarantees the integrity of DNS resolution by establishing a chain of trust all the way back to the root. Data security is ensured by a mechanism of cryptographic keys that sign DNS zone records. Historically, DNS operators have used RSA keys (RSASHA256 algorithm), renowned for their robustness.

As an alternative to this asymmetric cryptographic algorithm, there are elliptic curve algorithms. In the case of DNSSEC, the “ECDSA Curve P-256 with SHA-256” algorithm (RFC 6605 and 8624) offers a higher level of security with smaller key sizes.

The ECDSA algorithm is increasingly being implemented by major players in the domain names industry, such as Verisign and AFNIC, and aims to become the standard.

This has several advantages over our current implementation:

  • Smaller signatures and smaller zone files (approx. -33%);
  • Faster zone transfer and reload;
  • Improved signing performance;
  • Potentially faster DNS requests (less reliance on IP fragmentation);
  • Reduced amplification factor of DDoS attacks based on DNS.

For all these reasons, Nameshield has chosen to use this algorithm by default to secure its own domain names and those of its customers.

Image credit : Nameshield with storyset.com